{"id":631,"date":"2012-05-19T19:33:00","date_gmt":"2012-05-19T19:33:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/?p=631"},"modified":"2023-12-21T17:17:05","modified_gmt":"2023-12-21T17:17:05","slug":"court-wrestles-with-what-it-means-to-continue-a-prior-nonconforming-use","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/2012\/05\/19\/court-wrestles-with-what-it-means-to-continue-a-prior-nonconforming-use\/","title":{"rendered":"Court wrestles with what it means to &#8220;continue&#8221; a prior nonconforming use"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>A Mississippi appeals court ruled that an owner of an RV park on could allow portable cabins to be placed on the property as well as RVs.\u00a0<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/ms-court-of-appeals\/1556330.html\" target=\"_blank\">Jones v. Lutken,<\/a>\u00a062 So. 3d 455 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011). Many courts would find any change like this that expands the use of the property in any appreciable way to exceed the prior nonconforming use limitation but some courts, like this one, are more forgiving.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"taxonomy-category wp-block-post-terms\"><a href=\"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/category\/zoning\/\" rel=\"tag\">Zoning<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Mississippi appeals court ruled that an owner of an RV park on could allow portable cabins to be placed on the property as well as RVs.\u00a0Jones v. Lutken,\u00a062 So. 3d 455 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011). Many courts would find any change like this that expands the use of the property in any appreciable way to exceed the prior nonconforming use limitation but some courts, like this one, are more forgiving.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[44],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-631","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-zoning"],"featured_image_src":null,"featured_image_src_square":null,"author_info":{"display_name":"jsinger","author_link":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/author\/jsinger\/"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/631","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=631"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/631\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=631"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=631"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=631"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}