{"id":643,"date":"2012-02-26T19:50:00","date_gmt":"2012-02-26T19:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/?p=643"},"modified":"2023-12-21T17:17:06","modified_gmt":"2023-12-21T17:17:06","slug":"vermont-prevents-creditor-from-attaching-tenancy-by-the-entirety-property","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/2012\/02\/26\/vermont-prevents-creditor-from-attaching-tenancy-by-the-entirety-property\/","title":{"rendered":"Vermont prevents creditor from attaching tenancy by the entirety property"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The Vermont Supreme Court held, in<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/advance.lexis.com\/GoToContentView?requestid=6eb4f7d9-0059-4c9b-9e2d-3cfee1046a2c\" target=\"_blank\">\u00a0RBS Citizens v. Ouhrabka<\/a>, 30 A.3d 1266 2011 VT 86 (Vt. 2011), that creditors cannot attach tenancy by the entirety property unless both spouses agreed to the debt. This appears to be the majority rule in the country although some states disagree.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"taxonomy-category wp-block-post-terms\"><a href=\"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/category\/marital-property\/\" rel=\"tag\">Marital Property<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Vermont Supreme Court held, in\u00a0RBS Citizens v. Ouhrabka, 30 A.3d 1266 2011 VT 86 (Vt. 2011), that creditors cannot attach tenancy by the entirety property unless both spouses agreed to the debt. This appears to be the majority rule in the country although some states disagree.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-643","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-marital-property"],"featured_image_src":null,"featured_image_src_square":null,"author_info":{"display_name":"jsinger","author_link":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/author\/jsinger\/"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/643","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=643"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/643\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=643"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=643"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.law.harvard.edu\/joseph-singer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=643"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}