Fairness Versus Welfare.<\/em> (with Steven Shavell) (Harvard University Press<\/a>, 2002; Chinese translation, Law Press China, 2007). [Amazon (purchase)<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Analytical Methods for Lawyers<\/em> (with Steven Shavell, W. Kip Viscusi, & David Cope) (3nd ed.; Foundation Press, 2017. [Amazon (purchase)<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Previous editions of Analytical Methods for Lawyers: From Analytical Methods for Lawyers, 1st Edition: On the Representativeness of Voter Turnout (with Scott Kominers), Journal of Law and Economics<\/em>, vol. 67, pp. 879-904 (2024). [Journal of Law and Economics<\/a>] [NBER<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n A Unified Perspective on Efficiency, Redistribution, and Public Policy, National Tax Journal<\/em>, vol. 73, pp. 429-472 (2020). [National Tax Journal<\/a>] [NBER<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Optimal Regulation with Exemptions, International Journal of Industrial Organization<\/em>, vol. 66, pp. 1-39 (2019). [International Journal of Industrial Organization<\/a>] [NBER<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Balancing Versus Structured Decision Procedures: Antitrust, Title VII Disparate Impact, and Constitutional Law Strict Scrutiny, University of Pennsylvania Law Review<\/em>, vol. 167, pp. 1375-1462 (2019).\u00a0\u00a0[University of Pennsylvania Law Review<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n On the Design of Legal Rules: Balancing Versus Structured Decision Procedures, Harvard Law Review<\/em>, vol. 132, pp. 992-1065 (2019). [Harvard Law Review<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Optimal Design of Private Litigation, Journal of Public Economics<\/em>, vol. 155, pp. 64-73 (2017).\u00a0[Journal of Public Economics<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Optimal Multistage Adjudication,\u00a0Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization<\/em>, vol. 33, pp. 613-652 (2017)\u00a0[Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Information and the Aim of Adjudication: Truth or Consequences?,\u00a0Stanford Law Review<\/em>, vol. 67, 1303-1371 (2015).\u00a0[Stanford Law Review<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Likelihood Ratio Tests and Legal Decision Rules,\u00a0American Law and Economics Review<\/em>, vol. 16, 1-39 (2014).\u00a0[American Law and Economics Review<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Multistage Adjudication,\u00a0Harvard Law Review<\/em>, vol. 126, 1179-1298 (2013).\u00a0[Harvard Law Review<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Optimal Control of Externalities in the Presence of an Income Tax,\u00a0International Economic Review<\/em>, vol. 53, 487-509 (2012).\u00a0[International Economic Review<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Burden of Proof,\u00a0Yale Law Journal<\/em>, vol. 121, 738-859 (2012).\u00a0[Yale Law Journal<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n On the Optimal Burden of Proof,\u00a0Journal of Political Economy<\/em>, vol. 119, 1104-1140 (2011).\u00a0[Journal of Political Economy<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Discount Rates, Social Judgments, Individuals’ Risk Preferences, and Uncertainty (with David Weisbach),\u00a0Journal of Risk and Uncertainty<\/em>, vol. 42, 125-142 (2011). [Journal of Risk and Uncertainty<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Optimal Proof Burdens, Deterrence, and the Chilling of Desirable Behavior,\u00a0American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings<\/em>, vol. 101, 277-280 (2011). [American Economic Review<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Taxes, Permits, and Climate Change, in\u00a0U.S. Energy Tax Policy<\/em>\u00a0(Metcalf, ed., Cambridge University Press, 2011), 168-192.\u00a0[Cambridge University Press<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Social Evaluation of Intergenerational Policies and Its Application to Integrated Assessment Models of Climate Change (with Elisabeth Moyers & David Weisbach), B.E. Journal of Economics Analysis & Policy<\/em>, vol. 10, issue 2, art. 7, 1-32 (2010); also in Distributional Aspects of Energy and Climate Change (Cohen, Fullerton & Topel, eds., Edward Elgar, 2013), pp. 41-74.. [BE Press <\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Optimal Policy with Heterogeneous Preferences. 8\u00a0B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy: Advances<\/em>, Issue 1, Article 40, 1-28. (2008)\u00a0[B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy: Advances<\/a>] [NBER<\/a>]\u00a0[Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Income Taxation and Optimal Government Policy, in\u00a0The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics<\/em>, 2nd Edition (Durlauf & Blume, eds., Macmillan, 2008).[The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics<\/a>] \u00a0[Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Pareto Principle and Competing Principles, in\u00a0The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics<\/em>, 2nd Edition (Durlauf & Blume, eds., Macmillan, 2008).\u00a0[The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moral Rules, the Moral Sentiments, and Behavior: Toward a Theory of an Optimal Moral System (with Steven Shavell)\u00a0Journal of Political Economy<\/em>, vol. 115, 494-514 (2007).\u00a0[Journal of Political Economy<\/a>] [NBER<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Discounting Dollars, Discounting Lives: Intergenerational Distributive Justice and Efficiency,\u00a0University of Chicago Law Review<\/em>, vol. 74, 79-118 (2007).\u00a0[University of Chicago Law Review<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Value of a Statistical Life and the Coefficient of Relative Risk Aversion,\u00a0Journal of Risk and Uncertainty<\/em>, vol. 31, 23-34 (2005).\u00a0[Journal of Risk and Uncertainty<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n On the (Ir)Relevance of Distribution and Labor Supply Distortion to Government Policy,\u00a0Journal of Economic Perspectives<\/em>, vol. 18, no. 4, 159-175 (2004).\u00a0[Journal of Economic Perspectives<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Any Non-welfarist Method of Policy Assessment Violates the Pareto Principle: Reply (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0Journal of Political Economy<\/em>, vol. 112, 249-251 (2004).\u00a0[Journal of Political Economy<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Fairness versus Welfare: Notes on the Pareto Principle, Preferences, and Distributive Justice (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0Journal of Legal Studies<\/em>, vol. 32, 331-362 (2003).\u00a0[Journal of Legal Studies<\/a>]\u00a0[NBER WP<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Transition Policy: A Conceptual Framework,\u00a0Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues<\/em>, vol. 13, 161-209 (2003). [Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Economic Analysis of Law (with Steven Shavell), in\u00a0Handbook of Public Economics<\/em>\u00a0(Auerbach & Feldstein, eds.; Elsevier, 2002), vol. 3, pp. 1661-1784.\u00a0[Handbook of Public Economics<\/a>] [NBER<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n On the Superiority of Corrective Taxes to Quantity Regulation (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0American Law and Economics Review<\/em>, vol. 4, 1-17 (2002).\u00a0[JSTOR<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Any Non-Welfarist Method of Policy Assessment Violates the Pareto Principle, (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0Journal of Political Economy,\u00a0<\/em>vol. 109, 281-86 (2001).\u00a0[JSTOR<\/a>]\u00a0[NBER WP – Any Non-Individualistic Social Welfare Function Violates the Pareto Principle\u00a0<\/a>] [Olin Center WP – Any Non-Individualistic Social Welfare Function Violates the Pareto Principle<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Fairness versus Welfare (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0Harvard Law Review<\/em>, vol. 114, 961-1388 (2001).\u00a0[Harvard Law Review<\/a>] [Olin Center WP – Principles of Fairness versus Human Welfare: On the Evaluation of Legal Policy<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Notions of Fairness Versus the Pareto Principle: On the Role of Logical Consistency (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0Yale Law Journal<\/em>, vol. 110, 237-49 (2000).\u00a0[Yale Law Journal<\/a>][Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n General Characteristics of Rules, in\u00a0Encyclopedia of Law and Economics<\/em>, vol. V, pp. 502-28 (Bouckaert & DeGeest, eds.; Edward Elgar, 2000).\u00a0[Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Should Legal Rules Favor the Poor? Clarifying the Role of Legal Rules and the Income Tax in Redistributing Income (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0Journal of Legal Studies<\/em>, vol. 29, 821-35 (2000).\u00a0[JSTOR<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Conflict between Notions of Fairness and the Pareto Principle (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0American Law and Economic Review<\/em>, vol. 1, 63-79 (1999).\u00a0[American Law and Economics Review<\/a>] [Olin Center WP<\/a>] Accuracy in Adjudication, in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law<\/em> (Newman, ed.; Macmillan, 1998), pp. 1-7.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Accuracy in the Assessment of Damages (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0Journal of Law and Economics<\/em>, vol. 39, 191-210 (1996).\u00a0[Journal of Law and Economics<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Property Rules versus Liability Rules: An Economic Analysis (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0Harvard Law Review<\/em>, vol. 109, 713-790 (1996). [Harvard Law Review<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n How Tax Complexity and Enforcement Affect the Equity and Efficiency of the Income Tax,\u00a0National Tax Journal<\/em>, vol. 48, 135-150 (1996). Reprinted in\u00a0Tax Policy in the Real World<\/em>\u00a0(Slemrod, ed.; Cambridge University Press, 1999).\u00a0[National Tax Journal<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Do Liability Rules Facilitate Bargaining? A Reply to Ayres and Talley (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0Yale Law Journal<\/em>, vol. 105, 221-233 (1995). [Yale Law Journal<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n A Model of the Optimal Complexity of Legal Rules,\u00a0Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization<\/em>, vol. 11, 150-163 (1995).\u00a0[Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization<\/a>] [NBER WP <\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Optimal Insurance Contracts When Establishing the Amount of Loss is Costly,\u00a0Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory<\/em>, vol. 19, 139-152 (1994).\u00a0[The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Optimal Law Enforcement with Self-Reporting of Behavior (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0Journal of Political Economy<\/em>, vol. 102, 583-606 (1994).\u00a0[Journal of Political Economy<\/a>][NBER WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Accuracy in the Determination of Liability (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0Journal of Law and Economics<\/em>, vol. 37, 1-15 (1994).\u00a0[Journal of Law and Economics<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Value of Accuracy in Adjudication: An Economic Analysis,\u00a0Journal of Legal Studies<\/em>, vol. 23, 307-401 (1994). [Journal of Legal Studies<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why the Legal System Is Less Efficient than the Income Tax in Redistributing Income (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0Journal of Legal Studies<\/em>, vol. 23, 667-681 (1994).\u00a0[Journal of Legal Studies<\/a>] [NBER WP – The Efficiency of the Legal System versus the Income Tax in Redistributing Income\u00a0<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Shifting Plaintiffs’ Fees versus Increasing Damage Awards,\u00a0RAND Journal of Economics<\/em>, vol. 24, 625-630 (1993).\u00a0[RAND Journal of Economics<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n An Ex Ante Perspective on Deregulation, Viewed Ex Post,\u00a0Resource and Energy Economics<\/em>, vol. 15, 153-173 (1993). [Resource and Energy Economics<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Optimal Sanctions and Differences in Individuals’ Likelihood of Avoiding Detection (with Lucian Bebchuk),\u00a0International Review of Law and Economics<\/em>, vol. 13, 217-224 (1993).\u00a0[International Review of Law and Economics<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Rules Versus Standards,\u00a0Duke Law Journal<\/em>, vol. 42, 557-629 (1992). [Duke Law Journal<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Government Relief for Risk Associated with Government Action,\u00a0Scandinavian Journal of Economics<\/em>, vol. 94, 525-541(1992).\u00a0[Scandinavian Journal of Economics<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Optimal Probability and Magnitude of Fines for Acts That Definitely Are Undesirable,\u00a0International Review of Law and Economics<\/em>, vol. 12, 3-11 (1992).\u00a0[International Review of Law and Economics<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Private Versus Socially Optimal Provision of Ex Ante Legal Advice (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization<\/em>, vol. 8, 306-320 (1992).\u00a0[Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Optimal Sanctions When Individuals Are Imperfectly Informed About the Probability of Apprehension (with Lucian Bebchuk),\u00a0Journal of Legal Studies<\/em>, vol. 21, 365-370 (1992).\u00a0[Journal of Legal Studies<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Incentives and Government Relief for Risk,\u00a0Journal of Risk and Uncertainty<\/em>, vol. 4, 167-175 (1991).\u00a0[Journal of Risk and Uncertainty<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Optimal Taxation with Costly Enforcement and Evasion,\u00a0Journal of Public Economics<\/em>, vol. 43, 221-236 (1990).\u00a0[Journal of Public Economics<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Legal Advice about Acts Already Committed (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0International Review of Law and Economics<\/em>, vol. 10, 149-159 (1990).\u00a0[International Review of Law and Economics<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Optimal Deterrence, Uninformed Individuals, and Acquiring Information about Whether Acts Are Subject to Sanctions,\u00a0Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization<\/em>, vol. 6, 93-128 (1990). [Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n A Note on the Optimal Use of Nonmonetary Sanctions,\u00a0Journal of Public Economics<\/em>, vol. 42, 245-247 (1990). [Journal of Public Economics<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Legal Advice about Information to Present in Litigation: Its Effects and Social Desirability (with Steven Shavell),\u00a0Harvard Law Review<\/em>, vol. 102, 565-615 (1989). [Harvard Law Review<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Antitrust, Law & Economics, and the Courts,\u00a0Law and Contemporary Problems<\/em>, vol. 50, 181-216 (1987). [Law and Contemporary Problems<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Optimal Transition Policy: Replacing Horizontal Equity with an Ex Ante Incentives Perspective, Dissertation accepted by Harvard University Department of Economics (1987).<\/p>\n\n\n\n An Economic Analysis of Legal Transitions,\u00a0Harvard Law Review<\/em>, vol. 99, 509-617 (1986). [Harvard Law Review<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Private Versus Social Costs in Bringing Suit,\u00a0Journal of Legal Studies<\/em>, vol. 15, 371-385 (1986). [Journal of Legal Studies<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Note, The Theoretical Foundation of the Hearsay Rules,\u00a0Harvard Law Review<\/em>, vol. 93, 1786-1815 (1980). [Harvard Law Review<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Books Fairness Versus Welfare. (with Steven Shavell) (Harvard University Press, 2002; Chinese translation, Law Press China, 2007). [Amazon (purchase)] Analytical Methods for Lawyers (with Steven Shavell, W. Kip Viscusi, & David Cope) (3nd ed.; Foundation Press, 2017. [Amazon (purchase)] Previous editions of Analytical Methods for Lawyers:Analytical Methods for Lawyers, 2nd edition (2011)Analytical Methods for Lawyers, 1st edition (2003) From …<\/p>\n
Analytical Methods for Lawyers<\/em>, 2nd edition (2011)
Analytical Methods for Lawyers<\/em>, 1st edition (2003)<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Decision Analysis, Game Theory, and Information<\/em> (2003) [Amazon (purchase)<\/a>]
Contracting<\/em> (2004) [Amazon (purchase)<\/a>]
Microeconomics<\/em> (2004) [Amazon (purchase)<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\nJournal Articles, Book Chapters, and Encyclopedia Entries<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Accuracy, Complexity, and the Income Tax,\u00a0Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization<\/em>, vol. vol. 14, 61-83 (1998).\u00a0[The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization<\/a>] [NBER WP<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n